Australia vs Egypt

Current version

What shaped the view

• The first-half 0.75 prices are nearly split, so they point to an efficient early-tempo market rather than a clear first-half angle. Expect caution before the first goal, then higher transition risk if Australia have to chase.
• Egypt's 4-2-3-1 has the cleaner regulation-time shot supply through Fathy/Attia behind Ashour, Salah, Ziko and Marmoush, with Trezeguet, Ibrahim Adel, Zizo and Hamza available to refresh the attack. Australia still have a real cover route through Bos/Behich width, Souttar set pieces and direct late forwards, so this is not a strong mismatch.
• Closest rejected family was Goals Over/Under, especially Under 2. Knockout caution supports a lower tempo, but Under and BTTS No are more fragile once either team trails because both benches can add attackers. BTTS Yes was also rejected because Australia's high-quality-shot path is more set-piece/transition based than consistently territorial.